comments are closed on this review, click here for worldwidereview home
From:
Category: Art
Date: 15 February 2006
Not only does this short review of Micheal Landy at Tate Britain not make sense due to simple typographic mistakes, but it in no way qualifies its reason for criticism. This is nothing more than personal opinion, which in itself I have no problem with, but masquerading as relevant criticism I certainly do. Why is he mediocre (notice spelling!) and exactly which other artists is he guilty of eclipsing?
comments are closed on this review, click here for worldwidereview home